- Membership
- MAA Press
- Meetings
- Competitions
- Community
- Programs
- Students
- High School Teachers
- Faculty and Departments
- Underrepresented Groups
- MAA Awards
- MAA Grants

- News
- About MAA

Publisher:

W. W. Norton

Publication Date:

2008

Number of Pages:

208

Format:

Hardcover

Price:

24.95

ISBN:

978-0393060270

[Reviewed by , on ]

Craig P. Bauer

09/22/2008

When I first received this book, I thought it had been damaged en route. The dust jacket had small tears in it and even some chunks missing. (See the note below.) Taking a closer look, I quickly realized that the dust jacket was actually intact with no tears; it was simply designed to look worn, as if the book had been around since Charles Dodgson’s time. Inside, the pages looked like any other book although nearly half of them contained pictures or illustrations. Coupled with the book’s short length (a little over two hundred pages) and nontechnical nature (aimed at a general audience), this made for a quick read. A high percentage of the text is direct quotes from Dodgson via letters, books, and various publications, including some originally only intended for his siblings. The effect will be entertaining for those who enjoy Dodgson’s arithmetical and logical games. Indeed, the quotes are so numerous that it is almost as if Dodgson had written the book himself. Biographical details are provided for context, but the emphasis is clearly on Dodgson’s mathematics.

For this reviewer, the most interesting part concerned Dodgson’s “matrix cipher.” It is not what we think of today as matrix encryption (a.k.a. the Hill cipher, after Lester Hill), but rather a method of encipherment that begins with the alphabet arranged in a rectangular array (referred to as a matrix), like the Polybius and Playfair ciphers, and uses no linear algebra. This system had previously been analyzed in a *Cryptologia* article, “Matrix Cipher of C. L. Dodgson” by Stanley H. Lipson and Francine Abeles (Volume XIV Number 1 (January 1990) pp. 28-36).

The book succeeds in being understandable to a general audience. The task is made a bit simpler by the fact that Dodgson’s work was not on extremely difficult problems, so that there are no heavy prerequisites. The most advanced work reproduced is his well known “Method of Condensation” for finding determinants and the author does an excellent job in presenting the necessary background from scratch. This particular topic has also been presented elsewhere recently. See for example *The College Mathematics Journal*, “Shutting up like a telescope”: Lewis Carroll’s “Curious” Condensation Method for Evaluating Determinants by Adrian Rice and Eve Torrence, pp. 85-95, March 2007 (vol. 38 no.2) and, by the same authors, *Math Horizons*, “Lewis Carroll's Condensation Method of Evaluating Determinants,” Volume 14, Nov. 2006. The 2007 paper is incorrectly referenced in Wilson’s book as “*College Mathematical Journal* 38 (February 2007).” Although I wasn’t acting as a proofreader, this was the only error I noticed. The book seems to have been written with great care.

Other topics of interest include Dodgson’s work on voting schemes (none are fair in all cases), Venn diagrams, and his book *Euclid and his Modern Rivals*. I had heard of this book before and assumed it dealt with non-Euclidean geometry. It does not — it simply critiques recent texts that attempted to improve upon *The Elements* by presenting Euclidean geometry in a different manner. Dodgson rejected all such attempts.

In summary, Wilson’s latest effort will likely be enjoyed by everyone who is a fan of Lewis Carroll, be they mathematicians or not.

*Editor's note: this review is based on the British edition of the book.*

* *

Craig Bauer is an Associate Professor of mathematics at York College of Pennsylvania. He also serves as the editor-in-chief of *Cryptologia*, a quarterly journal devoted to all aspects of cryptology.

The table of contents is not available.

- Log in to post comments

## Comments

## Kuldeep Singh

The book tells the story of Charles Dodgson, who is better known as Lewis Carroll, the author of various fictions such as

Alice in WonderlandandThrough the Looking Glass. The book is divided into eight fits and describes how Charles Dodgson was not just the writer of fictions but also a professional mathematician contributing to linear algebra, logic, mathematical puzzles, geometry etc.It is good to see that the author does not shy away from putting some of the mathematics that interested Charles Dodgson. The mathematics in the book ranges from his defence of Euclid's Elements to his book

Elementary Treatise on Determinants. However his main interest was in mathematical logic, in which he wroteSymbolic Logic,published in 1896. He also wrote various mathematical puzzles.Over the last 100 years a lot has been written about Dodgson's interest in children, often suggesting something disturbing, but Wilson refutes all these claims. I do wonder how the politically correct will accommodate this refutation, given that the book contains photographs of young children taken by Dodgson.

There are some engaging stories about Charles Dodgson, such as that he made a case for a Mathematical Institute at the University of Oxford in 1868. Oxford had to wait another 65 years before a Mathematical Institute was built. Another fascinating story tells that when his Oxford College (Christ Church) was in financial difficulty, Dodgson proposed that his salary be lowered from £300/year to £200/year. In present day circumstances this would be an unthinkable (or even stupid) act!

The book is well written, with both characters, Charles Dodgson and Lewis Carroll, being described as a mathematician and an author of fiction. The book can be hard to follow in places if you are not familiar with A level mathematics but it is possible to skip these parts and maintain the flow of the book. It is a hard balance to strike between putting mathematics into a book like this which can lead to decreased sales and having no mathematics which would be a very serious omission. Robin Wilson has struck the right balance between these two conflicting notions.

Kuldeep Singh's homepage is at http://mathsforall.co.uk/