Reports from Finding Common Ground, Indianapolis, March 2006
In the past decade there has been considerable conflict over K-12
mathematics curriculum and instruction in the United States. It is
mentioned in the popular
press, in the
halls of government, and in the business community. K-12 mathematics
education
is at the heart of this crisis. The conflict has
distracted many mathematicians and
mathematics educators and has, therefore, impeded efforts to improve
mathematics education.
The objective of Finding Common Ground
meeting, held on the campus of Indiana University Purdue University
Indianapolis March 2-5, 2006, was to demonstrate that it is possible to
reach agreement and elaborate on the topics that
need attention in
such a way as to allow the community to make significant strides toward
improving U.S. school mathematics education. We began on Thursday
evening, March 2. During the meeting, each of five groups was
asked to explore their differences and to try to find common ground on
their
topic. Essentially, the groups spent two days (Friday
and Saturday, March 3 and 4) in intense discussions. These reports were
the presentations made by the groups on Sunday morning,
These reports represent the results
of particular individuals, over a very short time period; thus what you
will find is necessarily incomplete and cannot be expected to fully
resolve any set of issues. The reports do not represent the policy of
the MAA, nor are they endorsed by the meetings' steering committee.
Please view them as what they are: the output of dedicated groups
working hard toward a common goal.
What was remarkable about the meeting was
the level of engagement of the groups, and the willingness of
participants to listen carefully to each other to try to understand the
foundational questions that underly different perspectives. It is not
reasonable, or even desirable, to reach complete agreement on what the
"best" approach to mathematics education is; what is reasonable, and
desirable, is that we find broad areas of common ground that allow
those with divergent opinions to nevertheless work together to improve
K-12 mathematics instruction.
Reports:
Steering Committee:
- Richard Schaar, Texas Instruments
- Deborah Ball, University of Michigan
- Joan Ferrini-Mundy, Michigan State University
- Jeremy Kilpatrick, University of Georgia
- Jim Milgram, Stanford University
- Wilfried Schmid, Harvard University
- Michael Pearson, Mathematical Association of America
Return to Common Ground
project home page