| VW - CVM 1.1 |
If G is any of the wallpaper groups, we have said
that a function f is G-invariant if
.
We modify this slightly to insist that this equation should hold for all
x only when g belongs to G. Thus we reserve
the language of G-invariance for situations where f is not invariant
under any group larger than G.
In addition to showing how to construct functions invariant with respect to
every wallpaper group G
, we have also given recipes for creating functions with given
anti-symmetry
. Recall that if k is an isometry of the Euclidean
plane and if
.
At first glance, one might assume that a G-invariant function could
have a large collection of unrelated negating symmetries, complicating the
proposed classification. For example, in our motivating example
, there are several parallel
negating mirrors, numerous negating half-turns, but also a negating
diagonal half-translation. Need we consider patterns with some but not all
of these negating symmetries? It turns out that in classifying patterns,
we need consider the case with only a single negating symmetry.
Proposition:
Suppose f is G-invariant and k-negating.
Then every negating symmetry of f has the form kg,
where g is in G.
Proof: First observe that the inverse of k is a
negating symmetry:
Similarly, it is easy to show that the product of two negating symmetries is
a positive symmetry of f. Thus if k* is any
negating symmetry, composing k* with
k-1 must result in a positive symmetry, namely an element
g of G. Transposing shows that k* is
kg.
Further observations simplify the picture. If f is
G-invariant and k-negating, then the function |f|
given by
The situation becomes elegant when stated in terms of algebra:
Theorem: G is normal in E and the quotient E/G is cyclic of order 2, unless f has no negating symmetries in which case E and G are the same.
Thus, in classifying wallpaper functions with a given invariance group in mind, one need only look for a single negating symmetry to generate whatever others the function may have.
The algebraic details follow
.
The classification result proceeds
with an exhaustive list of all possibilities,
identifying any two that are equivalent
.
|
|