 Membership
 MAA Press
 Meetings
 Competitions
 Community
 Programs
 Students
 High School Teachers
 Faculty and Departments
 Underrepresented Groups
 MAA Awards
 MAA Grants
 News
 About MAA
The Basic Library List Committee recommends this book for acquisition by undergraduate mathematics libraries.
George Boole (1815–64) was born in England. He had no formal education beyond the primary grades and taught himself Latin, Greek, French, mathematics, and no doubt much else besides. He began working as a schoolteacher at the age of 16 and started his own school a few years later. He was a schoolmaster until 1849, when he became the first professor of mathematics at the new Queen’s University in Cork, Ireland. People no longer have careers like that, and not only because they lack Boole’s amazing power of mind. He died young, the story being that he walked to work in the rain and took sick after which his wife, an adherent of the theory that like cures like, kept pouring more water on him, which made him worse and worse until he succumbed.
His early mathematical work was in differential equations, on which he wrote a book. It and another on finite differences were popular textbooks. In 1847 there appeared his 86page pamphlet, The Mathematical Analysis of Logic, a precursor to his 1854 The Laws of Thought.
The laws of thought were, essentially, Boolean algebra. Boole had the revolutionary idea of making logic algebraic, something that had never occurred to Aristotle. If x stands for “soft and squishy” then xx is “soft and squishy and soft and squishy”, so xx = x. It follows, by algebra, that x(1 ‒ x) = 0. That is, there is nothing that is soft and squishy and not soft and squishy: algebra has given us the law of the excluded middle.
Boole’s system was not quite today’s Boolean algebra. His “x + y” was the union of x and y only if they were disjoint. Later writers put it into the shape now has.
The more than 400 pages of the book give considerable elaboration of the system. For example, from
(0/0)wr + w(1 ‒ r) + (0/0)(1 ‒ w)r + (0/0)(1 ‒ w)(1 ‒ r) = w(1 ‒ r) + (0/0)wr + (0/0)(1 ‒ w)
we conclude that “Things productive of pleasure are, all wealth not preventative of pain, an indefinite amount of wealth that is preventative of pain, and an indefinite amount of what is not wealth.”
There are also several chapters on probability.
I think that no one who is not a devotee of mathematical logic, its history, and nineteenthcentury writing would read the book for its content. Mathematics moves on. However, it is good to see the start of an idea entirely new, and to read some of Boole’s serious and mellifluous prose (“If science and true art shun defect and extravagance alike, much more does virtue pursue the undeviating line of moderation” — we’ve lost the ability to write like that). I’m glad to have the book.
Woody Dudley retired from teaching in 2004 and therefore has no need to use logic.
Chapter I. Nature and Design of this Work


Chapter II. Signs and their Laws  
Chapter III. Derivation of the Laws  
Chapter IV. Division of Propositions  
Chapter V. Principles of Symbolical Reasoning  
Chapter VI. Of Interpretation  
Chapter VII. Of Elimination  
Chapter VIII. Of Reduction  
Chapter IX. Methods of Abbreviation  
Chapter X. Conditions of a Perfect Method  
Chapter XI. Of Secondary Propositions  
Chapter XII. Methods in Secondary Propositions  
Chapter XIII. Clarke and Spinoza  
Chapter XIV. Examples of Analysis  
Chapter XV. Of the Aristotelian Logic  
Chapter XVI. Of the Theory of Probabilities  
Chapter XVII. General Method in Probabilities  
Chapter XVIII. Elementary Illustrations  
Chapter XIX. Of Statistical Conditions  
Chapter XX. Problems on Causes  
Chapter XXI. Probability of Judgments  
Chapter XXII. Constitution of the Intellect  
Comments
Another edition
A newer (2003) republication of Boole's Laws of Thought published by Prometheus Books contains an introduction by John Corcoran that puts Boole's treatment of logic in historical perspective. This makes it more valuable than the 1958 Dover reprint for those readers most likely to give a serious reading to Boole's work.