**The Origin and Early Impact of the Moore Method**

by David E. Zitarelli

david.zitarelli@temple.edu

The Moore Method for training students to become successful research mathematicians is usually associated solely with the state of Texas. Is that association warranted? Does the historical record support such a conclusion? What about Pennsylvania? This paper examines the origin of the method before R. L. Moore taught at the University of Texas, and then describes its impact afterwards. Moore’s symbiotic relationship with J. R. Kline at the University of Pennsylvania plays a central role.

**Projective Geometry over F1 and the Gaussian Binomial Coefficients**

by Henry Cohn

cohn@microsoft.com

There is no field with only one element, yet there is a well-defined notion of what projective geometry over such a field means. This notion is familiar to experts and plays an interesting role behind the scenes in combinatorics and algebra, but it is rarely discussed as such. The purpose of this article is to bring it to the attention of a broader audience, as the solution to a puzzle about Gaussian binomial coefficients.

**A Fresh Look at the Method of Archimedes**

by Tom M. Apostol and Mamikon A. Mnatsakania

apostol@caltech.edu, manikon@caltech.edu

This paper introduces Archimedean globes, a family of solids that circumscribe a sphere. Cross sections of each globe by planes parallel to the equatorial plane are disks bounded by similar polygons that circumscribe the circular cross sections of the sphere. Like the sphere, which is a limiting case, an Archimedean globe has both volume and surface area two-thirds that of its circumscribing prismatic container. The results are obtained geometrically. The volume and surface area of any Archimedean shell, the region between two Archimedean globes, are also determined. Surprising consequences of these new results are: several families of incongruent solids having both equal volume and equal total surface area; the quadrature of the sine curve; and the centroid of any slice of a spherical surface.

**Heesch’s Tiling Problem**

by Casey Mann

cmann@uttyler.edu

Heesch’s tiling problem concerns the number of layers that can be formed from copies of a tile *T *around a centrally placed copy of *T* (this number is the Heesch number of *T*). Surprisingly, before 1991 no tiles with finite Heesch number greater than 1 where known. Then tiles with Heesch numbers 2 and 3 were discovered. This paper presents new examples of tiles with Heesch numbers 4 and 5. We go on to discuss the connections of Heesch’s tiling problem to other famous unsolved tiling problems, including the Einstein problem that concerns aperiodic monotiles.

**Notes**

**A Construction concerning ( l^{P})' l^{q}**

by Gilbert Helmberg

gilbert.helmberg@telering.at

**Translating Inequalities between Hardy and Bergman Spaces**

by Kehe Zhu

kzhu@math.albany.edu

**A Simple Proof of the Descartes Rule of Signs**

by Xiaoshen Wang

xxwang@ualr.edu

**Another Proof That R ^{3 }Has No Square Root**

by Sam B. Nadler, Jr.

nadler@math.wvu.edu

**An Interesting Recursion**

by Steven H. Weintraub

shw2@lehigh.edu

**On the Middle Coefficient of a Cyclotomic Polynomial**

by Gregory P. Dresden

dresdeng@wlu.edu

**Problems and Solutions**

**Reviews**

**Mathematical Modeling of Physical Systems: An Introduction**

by Diran Basmadjian

Reviewed by Douglas R. Shier

shierd@clemson.edu