The Crooked Made Straight: Roberval and Newton on Tangents
by Paul R. Wolfson
The tangent vector to a curve is the velocity vector of a moving point. To find the velocity vector, decompose the motion into simpler motions, find the velocity vectors of those motions, and reconstruct the desired vector. Our clear language of vectors makes this seem simple. In the mid-seventeenth century, however, mathematicians developed this method to treat a larger class of curves that were the result of "composition of motions". Because of the vagueness of their term, Descartes fell into error, and Roberval was unable to make clear why his results were correct. Even Newton erred when he reinvented the method in the 1660's. His quick recovery is interesting to trace. In order to include all examples of the composition of motions, and not just vector sums, Newton used the Galilean principle of relativity of motion. The method he evolved was essential in his first systematic exposition of the calculus.
Solution of a Calculus Problem on Minimal Volume
by David Spring
An interesting geometrical problem in R3 is to find the minimal area of a triangle that passes through a given point in the first octant and whose vertices lie, respectively, on the positive coordinate axes. This problem was the subject of a book prize in 1997. Our solution of the problem for the book prize, which generalizes to solve the analogous problem in the positive orthant in Rn , n 3, calculates the vertices of the minimal triangle by an elementary formula in terms of the coordinates of the given point. In all cases the formula can be computed approximately by using Newton's Rule. No closed form solution for the minimal area is known.
Similarities in Irrationality Proofs for pi, ln2, zeta(2) and zeta(3)
by Dirk Huylebrouck
When the irrationality of numbers is discussed, the irrationality of the square root of 2 often constitutes the only example that is given at college level. Yet, proofs for the irrationality of other more famous numbers such as pi and its square are fairly simple as well. The irrationality of pi dominated a good 2000 years of mathematical history, starting with the related circle-squaring problem of the ancient Greeks. The interest in piĘs younger colleagues zeta(2) and zeta(3) started only a few centuries ago, and the latter number resisted until some twenty years ago. However, even very recently, Tanguy Rivoal's results about the zeta numbers could still upset the mathematical community.
Simultaneous presentation of four irrationality proofs has the advantage of showing their similarity as well as the occurrence of another popular number, the golden mean, and its generalizations, called "the metallic means". The reader is seriously warned about common misconceptions about these numbers, such as those about "most elegant" rectangles. Loose statements about numbers that are interpreted as "optimal" solutions do not correspond to the standard mathematical terminology, but the various irrationality proofs provided in this paper do lead to expressions where these metallic means pop up as true optimal solutions.
The Matrices of Pascal and other Greats
by Lidia Aceto and Donato Trigiante
Historical references to the Pascal matrix go back to the fourteenth century. It is mentioned in an ancient book of Chinese mathematics. Its many properties continue to surprise also for the variety of its applications in such diverse fields as probability, numerical analysis, surface reconstruction, and combinatorics. Recent studies of its properties have taken new directions, which highlight its relations with other important matrices. In this paper such connections are studied in a deeper way, establishing the relations existing between the Pascal matrix and some families of classical polynomials. For example, the Bernstein matrix Be(x), whose entries are the Bernstein polynomials, can be written in the very simple form
Leftovers from the Ham Sandwich Theorem
by Graham Byrnes, Grant Cairns, and Barry Jessup
email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, and email@example.com
The classical ham sandwich says that it is always possible to slice the sandwich with one cut so that the ham and both slices of bread are each divided into equal halves. Its traditional proof is a clever use of the Borsuk-Ulam Theorem, which is taught in many introductory courses on algebraic topology. A simple and intuitive alternative would be to take the plane through the centres of gravity of each of the three bodies, but this doesnĘt always work! We explain why this doesnĘt work, and investigate interesting situations where it does.
Some New Irrational Decimal Fractions
by Patrick Martinez
Monic Polynomials in Z(x) with Roots in the Unit Disc
by Pantelis A. Damianou
Pythagorean Triples of Polygonal Numbers
by Egon Scheffold
A Symmetry of Power Sum Polynomials and Bernoulli Numbers
by Hans J. H. Tuenter
Heronian Triangles are Latttice Triangles
by Paul Yiu
Evolution of. . .
On the Emotional Assumptions Without Which One Could Not Effectively Investigate the Laws of Nature
by Vi. P. Vizgin
translated by Abe Shenitzer
Problems and Solutions
The Moment of Proof: Mathematical Epiphanies.
By Donald C. Benson
Reviewed by Susan G. Staples
Mathematics Education Research: A Guide for the Research Mathematician.
By Curtis McKnight
Reviewed by George E. Andrews