This leads to the echelon factorization A = CaB, in which B contains the nonzero rows of rref(A), C contains the nonzero columns of (rref(A'))', of A. This factorization tells everything about the echelon bases for the fundamental subspaces. It was pointed out to us by Hans Schneider, and we learned that Albert Tucker and R. H. Bruck knew it too (but did not publish it).
Constructing Kaleidoscopic Tiling Polygons in the Hyperbolic Plane
by S. Allen Broughton
Tiling the hyperbolic plane by iterated reflection in the sides of a kaleidoscopic polygon can be employed to make many beautiful and artistic patterns in the plane. These constructions may be greatly assisted by computer methods, provided we can construct the sides and vertices of these polygons, and hence the reflections in the sides of these polygons. We show how simple analytic geometry may be used to construct kaleidoscopic triangles and quadrilaterals. This work was motivated by work with undergraduates Dawn Haney, Lori McKeough, and Brandi Smith at the Rose-Hulman NSF-REU Tilings project site (http://www.tilings.org/index.html). Indeed, the methods of the paper have been used for visualization in a classification project of all divisible tilings of the hyperbolic plane. A description of the project is available at the same site. More importantly, figures depicting the divisible tilings in the classification?using the methods of this paper?are given in the file http://www.tilings.org/images/divquad/table_all.pdf.
A Generalized Approach to the Fundamental Group
by Daniel K. Biss
We begin with a description of a basic phenomenon of algebraic topology: the correspondence between subgroups of the fundamental group of a space X and connected covers of X. The essential theorems in this subject are given historical and intuitive motivation, but proofs are mostly omitted. In the second half of the paper, we summarize recent work that uncovers a new piece of structure in the fundamental group, and exploit that structure to demonstrate that the conditions under which the correspondence holds are actually far weaker than was once believed.
The Sixtieth William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition
by Leonard F. Klosinski, Gerald L. Alexanderson, and Loren C. Larson
Putnam Trivia for the 90s
by Joseph A. Gallian
The annual Putnam competition has a long and glorious history of identifying extraordinary mathematical talent. Indeed, three Putnam Fellows (top 5 finishers) have won the Fields Medal and two have won a Nobel prize in Physics. In fact, the 1954 Harvard Putnam team included a future Fields Medalist and a future Nobel Laureate! And of course many Putnam Fellows have had distinguished careers starting with the very first winner of the Putnam Fellowship to Harvard?Irving Kaplansky. In the early days (1930s) only a few hundred students competed in the competition whereas by the 1990s over 2000 per year took part. In a 1989 issue of the MONTHLY I gave a list of trivia questions based on the first fifty years of the competition. In this article I offer trivia questions based on the competitions of the 1990s.
On Envy-Free Cake Division
by Oleg Pikhurko
Calculating Higher Derivatives of Inverses
by Tom Apostol
The Modulus of Polynomials with Zeros at the Roots of Unity
by Holly Carley and Xin Li
On the Norm of Idempotent Operators in a Hilbert Space
by Vladimir Rakocevic
A Simple Proof of a Theorem of Block and Hart
by Guang Yuan Zhang
PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS
The Interactive Geometry Software Cinderella
By J. Richter-Gebert and U. H. Kortenkamp
Reviewed by H. Burgiel
The Nature of Mathematical Modeling
By Neil Gershenfeld
Reviewed by Shirley B. Pomeranz