![]() |
Additional Online Case Studies & Appendices | |
|
Assessing
the Mathematics Major Donna Flint and Daniel Kemp Appendix C Assessment Tool- Major Presentation Student: ____________________________ Faculty Reviewer: _____________________________ Start Time: _________ End Time: _________ Presentation grade: __________ You are assessing a 20 to 25 minute presentation based on the student’s research paper. Please assess the presentation based on the following criteria, using the scale as described in the attached memo. Learning objectives are listed in brackets. Please comment where appropriate or add additional comments on the back of this sheet. Delivery 1. How well did the student explain the pupose of the project? [5]
2. How well did the student organize the material? [5]
3. How well did the student’s presentation make use of overheads, PowerPoint, and/or other technology? [2]
4. How would you judge the student’s presence? (voice, delivery, etc.)? [5]
5. How well did the student answer/respond to questions and comments? [5]
Content 6. How well did the student communicate his/her understanding of the mathematics? [1,3,5]
7. How well was the mathematics developed through logical presentation, justification of assumptions and examples? [3,5]
Overall
Criteria for Student presentation assessment: 7 - Excellent - ready for presentation at a conference 6 - Very Good - needs refinement before presenting at a conference 5 - Good - needs 1-2 minor changes before presenting at a conference 4 - Satisfactory - needs 3-5 minor changes before presenting at a conference 3 - Poor-needs 1-2 major changes before presenting at a conference 2 - Very Poor - needs 3-5 major changes before presenting at a conference 1 – Unsatisfactory - presentation has little or no merit |