The book aims at an audience of (I quote from the back cover) “undergraduates, high school students and their teachers, mathematical contestants … and their coaches, as well as anyone interested in essential mathematics.” That is about the same audience as some other books on the market, notably Liangshin Hahn’s Complex Numbers & Geometry from the MAA, with which it has, inevitably, a nonempty overlap.
It’s certainly not a book on Complex Analysis. As the authors mention in the Introduction, the symbol \(e^{it}\) appears nowhere in the book. The book also misses on Möbius transformations, which take up about 20% of Hahn’s book. It does not refer to any plane curves, not even cycloids. Still, I do not quite understand why the authors seem to have hesitated in adopting a less ambiguous title; say, “Complex Numbers from A to Z.” The book is a real treasure trove of nontrivial elementary key concepts and applications of complex numbers developed in a systematic manner with a focus on problem solving techniques. Much of the book goes to geometric applications, of course, but there are also sections on polynomial equations, trigonometry, combinatorics…
The book is organized into six chapters, Glossary, authors’ and subject indices and a bibliography list. The chapters are as follows

Complex Numbers in Algebraic Form (pp. 1–28).

Complex Numbers in Trigonometric Form (pp. 29–52).

Complex Numbers and Geometry (pp. 53–88).

More on Complex Numbers and Geometry (pp. 89–160).

OlympiadCaliber Problems (pp. 161–252).

Answers, Hints and Solutions to Proposed Problems (pp. 253–306).
Chapter 5’s title is somewhat misleading. It may create an impression that the previous chapters dealt with trivial matters or that Chapter 5 offers exclusively mathematical chestnuts only worthy of olympiad experience. Neither will be true. Problems constitute an integral part of the book alongside theorems, lemmas and examples. The problems are embedded in the text throughout the book, partly as illustrations to the discussed concepts, partly as the testing grounds for the techniques just studied, but mostly I believe to emphasize the centrality of problem solving in the authors’ world view. Some problems, especially in chapters 3 and 4, have already been plucked from various olympiads and competitions: IMO, nationals, Putnam… By the time the interested reader reaches Chapter 5, the time may be ripe to tackle “OlympiadCaliber” problems. On the other hand, even Chapter 5 contains plenty of problems that are introductory in nature.
The book is really about solving problems and developing tools that exploit properties of complex numbers. The accumulation of the toolchest can be surmised from the subsection captions. For example Section 3.5 is split into: Equation of a line, Equation of a line determined by two points, The area of a triangle, Equation of a line determined by a point and a direction, The foot of a perpendicular from a point to a line, Distance from a point to a line. Section 4.6 sports such a sequence of subsections as The Distance OI, The Distance ON, The Distance OH. Aided by a subject index and a glossary, such a detailed table of contents makes the book very searchable. If you are looking for the formula for the area of a triangle, for example, then it is right there, in the table of contents. Characteristically, though, you’ll find not only the formula itself, but also some of its applications. Say, the Area of a triangle subsection contains two solved problems of which one applies immediately to proving Menelaus’ theorem.
In Chapter 4 the reader is treated to some unusual notions of the real and complex products of two complex numbers:
\[ u. v = (\bar{u} v + u \bar{v})/2 \qquad \text{ and } \qquad u\times v = (\bar{u}vu\bar{v})/2\]
These are none other than the scalar and vector products expressed in complex terms. E.g., \(u. u = u^2\). In a book on Complex Numbers their use is a real eye opener. I am aware of only one other book where complex numbers are mixed with the scalar product. This is Euclidean Geometry and Transformations by Clayton W. Dodge, where the basic object is the vector enhanced with the complex number symbolism. The book under review introduces the two products directly for the complex number objects. However simple and natural this usage is, this is something I have not seen done before. For example, the usual condition for the orthogonality of two lines UV and WZ (where a lowercase letter denotes the complex number corresponding to the point assigned the same letter in upper case) is commonly expressed as
\[ \frac{uv}{wz} + \frac{\bar{u}\bar{v}}{\bar{w}\bar{z}}=0,\]
meaning that in order for UV and WZ to be orthogonal the quotient \((u  v)/(w  z)\) must be purely imaginary. (This is demonstrated in Chapter 3.) The common condition is immediately seen to be equivalent to \((u  v).(w  z) = 0\), which is more suitable for algebraic manipulation. It is also delightfully efficient. An application proved to be effortless. Say, two triangles are called orthologic if the perpendiculars from the vertices of one onto the “opposite” sides of the other are concurrent. If we deal with triangles ABC and A'B'C', then the orthogonality condition is given by
\[ \begin{align*} (za). (b'c') &=0\\(zb). (c'a')&=0\\(zc). (a'b')&=0\end{align*}, \]
where \(z\) is just a variable. Taking it to be the point of concurrency, we add the three equations, eliminate \(z\) and obtain a concurrency condition
\[ a.(b'  c') + b.(c'  a') + c.(a'  b') = 0.\]
This is because, going backwards, this last equation is equivalent to
\[ (z_0  a).(b'  c') + (z_0  b).(c'  a') + (z_0  c).(a'  b') = 0,\]
for any \(z_0\).With little effort, our second equation can be rearranged into
\[a'.(b  c) + b'.(c  a) + c'.(a  b) = 0\]
which shows that the relation is indeed symmetric. This fact is known as Maxwell’s theorem after J. C. Maxwell who published a paper on the subject with an ingeniously beautiful proof (See, D. Pedoe Geometry: A Comprehensive Course, 114116.) The theorem has also elicited interest from J. Steiner who proved it in 1827.
The reader will find a good deal of elegant and simple sample problems and even a greater quantity of technically taxing ones. The book supplies many great tools to help solve those problems. As the techniques go, the book is truly “From A to Z”. Problem and example selection of course has been governed by authors’ taste and experience. I would certainly include a lovely problem due to the late M. Klamkin (Mathematics Magazine, 28, 1955, 293)
Prove that \( \cos(5) + \cos(77) + \cos(149) + \cos(221) + \cos(293) = 0\)
Its omission is hardly a big deal, though. But there are a couple of things worth complaining about. Annoyingly, William Wallace’s name is consistently misspelled as Wallance. It is misspelled in a short biographical footnote, in the Index and throughout the book whenever the SimsonWallace line has been mentioned.
The formulation of Proposition 1 in section 4.5 is obviously incorrect:
Consider the point X(x) in the plane of triangle ABC (with the circumcenter at the origin.) Let P be the projection of X onto BC. Then the coordinate of P is given by \[ p=\frac{1}{2}\left(x  \frac{bc}{R^2}\bar{x} + b +c\right), \] where R is the circumradius of triangle ABC.
Clearly the projection of a point on BC does not depend on A, whereas R does. To correct the formulation, X is to be taken on the circumcircle of triangle ABC. The mishap, if noticed by the clever mathematical contestants, will probably amuse, rather than disorient, them. On every occasion where the proposition is referred to, X is assumed to be in the right place. Less committed readers may get frustrated.
But the book is for a committed reader. It is for the readers who seek to harness new techniques and to polish their mastery of the old ones. It is for somebody who made it their business to be solving problems on a regular basis. These readers will appreciate the scope of the methodological detail the authors of the book bring to their attention, they will appreciate the power of the methods and the intricacy of the problems. Those who look for the “neglected mathematical beauty” may prefer the “guided tour” which is offered by Hahn’s book. A high school mathematics teacher and a team coach will do well owning both books, irrespective of their topical overlap.
Alex Bogomolny is a business and educational software developer who lives with his wife and two sons — 26 and 6 — in East Brunswick, NJ. Past December, his web site Interactive Mathematics Miscellany and Puzzles has welcomed its 16,0000,000^{th} visitor.