Every year about this time, a new volume in Mircea Pitici’s *Best Writing on Mathematics* series, which started in 2010, appears in print; I was fortunate enough to review the 2012 and 2014 entries for this column, but in 2013 Sandra Keith beat me to the punch. This year, however, my luck improved. I like expository articles on mathematics, but seldom have the time during the academic year to seek them out, so it is always a pleasure to have somebody like Pitici assemble a collection of good ones for me. This year’s assortment, like those of the last few years, did not disappoint.

As in other years, the articles in this book (there are 29 of them this year, all published in 2014) cover a wide array of topics, not only in substantive mathematics but also in philosophy (one entry here discusses the nature of mathematical beauty; another, by Mark Balaguer, offers “a guide for mathematicians who don’t know much about the philosophy of mathematics — a guide that explains how to read philosophers of mathematics”), history (two articles discuss the history of the pigeonhole principle and the game of Nim, respectively), mathematics education (one article compares and contrasts mathematics education in the United States and China, another addresses proposals for high school education reform), and biography (a nice overview of the career of Martin Gardner).

The emphasis in this volume appears to be on recreational mathematics, games and puzzles. In addition to the previously mentioned historical discussion of Nim, there are, for example, pieces on the mathematics of juggling, the use of certain geometric shapes in games, mathematical issues related to the game Candy Crush, and how billiards leads to interesting mathematical questions.

Several entries here might prove to be of particular interest to teachers of undergraduate combinatorics or discrete mathematics (magic squares); probability and statistics (one article by Jeffrey Rosenthal talks about the role statistical analysis played in exposing a lottery retailer scandal in Canada; another article discusses how data gathering and interpretation may lead to inaccurate claims of statistical significance); abstract algebra (see, for example, the discussion of the quaternion group as a symmetry group); or Euclidean geometry (the Steiner-Lehmus theorem, a theorem I teach in my undergraduate course and which is notoriously hard to prove if you don’t “know the trick”, is discussed at some length, including the question of whether direct proofs of it are possible).

Several articles discuss geometry and art: for example, there is an article on mathematical aspects of the work of Albrecht Durer, and another, by Maor and Jost, a combination of text and original art, discusses various spirals and their role in mathematics. Readers of their book *Beautiful Geometry*, reviewed in this column about two years ago, will experience a strong sense of *déjà vu* here.

Some of the articles were of an interdisciplinary nature. One discusses the role of mathematics in a new discipline called synthetic biology, and another talks about the Tracy-Widom distribution, a “complex cousin of the familiar bell curve” that pops up in several different contexts involving complex systems.

And then there are the inevitable articles that simply defy easy characterization. The lead article in this collection, for example, discusses the role that the chalkboard has played in mathematical culture.

The above sampling of articles is not exhaustive, but should give a rough idea of the issues discussed in this volume. My selection is somewhat arbitrary, and the omission of an article should not be viewed as a comment on my opinion of its merits.

The articles here vary not only in subject matter but also in length and level of mathematical sophistication. Regarding the former, most seem to be about ten pages long, give or take a couple; some are longer, though, and one is about 25 pages long. As for the latter, there are some articles that require no knowledge of mathematics at all to understand, but a number seem to require at least a nodding acquaintance with standard undergraduate-level mathematics at, say, the junior level. For example, the article *The Quaternion Group as a Symmetry Group *is clearly intended for people who already know what a group is (although the quaternion group is defined from scratch). Ironically, the one article in the book that I felt that I lacked the prerequisites for was the one on Candy Crush, because the author does not begin the article with a discussion of the game or how it is played.

Some of the older editions in this series began with a Foreword by an eminent mathematician or physicist (Roger Penrose in 2013, David Mumford in 2012, Freeman Dyson in 2011, William Thurston in 2010), but this feature, unfortunately, seems to have disappeared as of 2014. Pitici continues to contribute, as he has in past volumes, a useful Introduction that, among other things, contains a rather complete list of other mathematics-themed books, usually pitched at a level accessible to a general reader, that were published in 2014.

In her review of the 2013 edition, Sandra Keith was critical of the fact that Pitici did not attempt to discuss his criteria for determining which mathematical writing was “best”. He doesn’t do that here either, but this omission didn’t bother me at all. Perhaps the difference in our reactions can be traced to a difference in our expectations. People who approach this book wanting to learn what makes mathematical writing the “best” may well be disappointed, but I assumed at the outset that words like “best” are subjective (and also likely hyperbole), and was really just looking for a collection of interesting articles with which to kill an hour or two at a time. I got what I wanted, and am looking forward to the 2016 volume.

Mark Hunacek (mhunacek@iastate.edu) teaches mathematics at Iowa State University.