**Year of Award: **2018

**Award: **Pólya

**Publication Information: ***The College Mathematics Journal*, Volume 48, Number 1, January 2017, pages 18-29.

**Summary: ** Modern treatments of Galois theory rely on facts about vector spaces over a field. This material was not available to Galois, whose approach mirrored Newton's explorations of symmetric polynomials. This article focuses on these polynomials as an accessible way for readers who do not know Galois theory to get acquainted, while also providing insight to informed readers that they may have missed in more streamlined treatments of the subject.

Symmetric polynomials (e.g., 4*x*_{1}*x*_{2}x_{3} and *x*_{1} + 2*x*_{1}*x*_{2} + *x*_{2}) are unchanged by any permutation of their variables, and among them are the elementary symmetric polynomials (e.g., in three variables, *x*_{1} + *x*_{2}+ x_{3}, *x*_{1}*x*_{2}+*x*_{1}x_{3}+*x*_{2}x_{3} and *x*_{1}*x*_{2}x_{3}). The fundamental theorem on symmetric polynomials (FTSP) reads:

Any symmetric polynomial in *n* variables may be represented in a unique way as a polynomial in the elementary symmetric polynomials in *n* variables.

For example (from the article), the symmetric polynomial (*x*_{1} −*x*_{2})^{2} can be represented as (*x*_{1} + *x*_{2})^{2} − 4*x*_{1}*x*_{2}. The authors give two proofs of this result—one classical (by Gauss), the other developed by participants in a 2009 course taught by the first author—and begin to shed light on its connection with Galois Theory. The classical proof uses lexicographic order to identify a leading monomial, which is then eliminated by subtracting an appropriate product of elementary symmetric polynomials. The authors suggest that focusing on a single monomial hides the symmetry that originally interested Newton and Galois. They propose an alternate proof, logically similar to the first proof but first identifying (and then eliminating) a full symmetry class consisting of monomials for which the exponent strings have maximum variance. This proof appeals more directly to symmetry and adds geometric insight via an appealing and intuitive “brick-stacking” argument. The authors then explain how the first proof is, in a sense, the limit of the second, and sketch an argument proving this by extending the original variance proof to arbitrary *p*th moments.

**Response from the Authors:**

We are very honored to receive this award. This article grew out of Ben’s desire to explore the teaching and learning of the foundations of Galois theory. He organized a like-minded group of learners and began teaching about symmetries, and later polynomials and solvability. One day a lesson about the fundamental theorem on symmetric polynomials hit an obstacle because the participants could not think of the clever trick needed to continue. Instead of accepting the solution and moving on, the two of us searched for another approach that would not have seemed so clever. Along the way, we explored some history as well as some new ways to look at the problem. Any small investigation between friends or students, together with some follow-up sleuthing, can lead to an article just like this one. We are grateful to the CMJ for providing a forum for this type of exposition.

**About the Authors:**

**Ben Blum-Smith** worked as a classroom teacher and teacher trainer for a decade before earning his PhD from NYU. In an oblique way, his thesis research, on a delicate structural property of modular invariant rings, grew out of the present article. He continues to be an active invariant theorist, and also has a more recent interest in interactions between mathematics and democracy. He is currently doing a TED residency exploring the latter. Ben writes about math, education and democracy at researchinpractice.wordpress.com, and tweets about them at @benblumsmith. In his spare time, he enjoys cooking and karaoke.

**Sam Coskey** received his PhD from Rutgers University, studying set theory. He participated in Project NExT and is now in the math department at Boise State University. Sam co-founded and co-directs the Boise Math Circle. Outside of math, he enjoys science fiction novels and cycling.