*This project uses a sampling problem to compute certain...*

**In the Shadow of Giants: A Section of American Mathematicians, 1925-1950**

David E. Zitarelli

175-191

The history of mathematics generally studies the work of giants in the field, like Newton, Euler, Gauss, Riemann, Poincaré, and Hilbert. When restricted to America, the towering figures include E. H. Moore, Veblen, Birkhoff, R. L. Moore, and Stone. But what about the professional activities of rank-and-file mathematicians? This article answers this question by examining the lives and work of five mathematicians who coalesced during 1925-50 to found and establish an MAA section. A closer examination reveals a surprisingly impressive array of outstanding achievements from individuals who deserve to be rescued from their present obscurity.

**Cartoon**

In De Morgan’s Grocery: The checker asks, Â“Not (not paper and not plastic)?Â”

Peter Schumer, with art by Amy Schumer and Eddingel Recaido

191

**Farmer Ted Goes 3D**

Shawn Alspaugh

192-204

One of the classic problems every calculus student faces involves minimizing the perimeter of rectangles with a fixed area. The answer often involves noninteger side lengths for the resulting square. In 1999, Greg Martin studied a variation of this problem, requiring all side lengths to be integers. We expand Martin's work into the third dimension. We define a sequence of numbers that are the volumes of rectangular boxes whose volume to surface area ratio is smallest among all such boxes with integer side lengths and smaller or equal volume. We then characterize these numbers, noticing they form three distinct groups that can be studied more carefully. We also discuss difficulties that arise when dealing with three dimensions as opposed to two, and give a theorem for determining if a given volume will minimize the volume to surface area ratio.

**Pythagorean Triples and Inner Products**

Larry J. Gerstein

205-213

The lattice generated by a set of linearly independent vectors is the set of linear combinations of those vectors having integer coefficients. In the present paper we use elementary properties of lattices to give a new perspective on Pythagorean triples, a topic in number theory that has been of interest for millennia. In the classical setting, formulas for the production of Pythagorean triples were derived from arithmetic manipulations in combination with elementary properties of congruences. But here the triples are shown to correspond to so called "isotropic" lattice vectors in a suitable three dimensional inner product space. Along the way we recapture a 19th-century theorem of Leonard Eugene Dickson, and we briefly discuss Pythagorean triples over rings other than the integers.

**Proof Without Words: Viviani’s Theorem **

Ken-ichiroh Kawasaki

213

In an equilateral triangle, the sum of the distances from any interior point to the three sides is equal to the altitude of the triangle. This theorem is proved by rotating certain equilateral triangles constructed inside the original triangle.

Wafer in a Box

Ralph Alexander and John E. Wetzel

214-220

How large a wafer can fit in a 5 by 7 by 8 box? How about a 5 by 7 by 9 box? We find an explicit formula for the radius of the largest disk that fits in an *a* by *b* by *c* rectangular box.

**A Theorem of Frobenius and Its Applications**

Dinesh Khurana and Anjana Khurana

220-225

The following fundamental theorem was proved by Frobenius more than hundred years back in 1895:

If *d* is a divisor of the order of a finite group *G*, then the number of solutions of *x ^{d}*=1 in

The result has many applications in Group theory and Number theory. We present the result and some of its applications in a way that uses only elementary knowledge of Group theory.

**Proof Without Words: (0,1) and [0,1] Have the Same Cardinality**

Kevin Hughes and Todd K. Pelletier

226

**A Â“BaseÂ” Count of the Rationals**

Brian D. Ginsberg

227-228

Cantor’s classic proof that the rationals are countable is presented in every set theory course in the country, but this is not the only way to prove that result. In this Note, we exhibit a concrete numerical method for counting the rationals that also works to count the algebraic numbers and other sets with similar desirable properties.

**Covering Systems of Congruences**

J. Fabrykowski and T. Smotzer

228-231

The note considers problems related to covering the set of integers by the finite unions of arithmetic progressions. There are two well-known conjectures on the topic: the Selfridge conjecture which states that the set of integers cannot be covered by the finite union of arithmetic progressions having all differences odd and distinct, and the Schinzel conjecture that states if the set of integers is covered by the finite union of arithmetic progressions, then there exist two differences such that one is a divisor of another. It has been known that the Selfridge conjecture implies the Schinzel conjecture, but the proof of this fact is not elementary and is based on the theory of irreducibility of polynomials. The authors provide a simple and elementary proof of this assertion.

**Proof Without Words: Sums of Triangular Numbers **

Roger B. Nelsen

231

A visual proof that the sum of the first n triangular numbers is *n*(*n*+1)(*n*+2)/6.

**On the Metamorphosis of Vandermonde's Identity**

Don Rawlings and Lawrence Sze

232-238

In recent times, monomial pollination has become highly controversial. Critics are quick to point out that, while raising expectations, the procedure has a dismal failure rate. Undeterred by the critics, we pollinate the classical Vandermonde identity of combinatorics with a monomial analogous to the one appearing in the sum of the binomial theorem. The ensuing metamorphosis results in a truly remarkable matrix identity. Besides implying a host of amusing identities for binomial coefficients ranging from the well-known to the exotic, our matrix identity finds application in the area of system reliability.

**Humor: Â“DecartesÂ” of Your Dreams**

Dawn W. Lindquist

244

Mathematicians in the market for a car today have many choices. While analytic geometers might be drawn to the Ford Focus and algebraists may assume the Isuzu Axiom is for them, graph theorists would probably still choose a Nissan PathfinderÂ….