Given the number of high quality geometry texts published within the past ten years or so, one could be forgiven for assuming that the subject has undergone some sort of renaissance within mathematics education. In reality, however, geometry still has no coherent presence within school mathematics and it continues to play only a minor role within undergraduate mathematics.
So here is a book whose overall aim is to ‘develop an intuitive feel for geometry whilst also establishing sound understanding of underlying proofs and abstractions’. This, of course, is the common challenge faced by authors of university geometry texts, who necessarily have the twofold task of laying foundations that should have been provided at school, whilst simultaneously transporting students into the realm of advanced geometric topics. But having taught geometry to undergraduate students, I long ago ceased to be amazed by their lack of basic geometric knowledge, and I have sometimes spent more time going backwards than forwards.
In addressing this dilemma, Michael Hvidsten has invoked the use of new technology in the form of Geometry Explorer (provided with the book). This, of course, is not the only way in which geometric intuition can be strengthened, and it can’t be expected to totally compensate for many previous years of geometric neglect. Nonetheless, although employed in a supplementary fashion, I very much like the use to which it is put. For example, in the very first exercise project, students use it to explore many properties of the Golden Rectangle. Much later on, it is used to investigate the tiling of the hyperbolic plane, and there are many other ‘projects’ that also involve the application of this software. In addition, students may be inclined to experiment with it of their own volition — and the more the better.
Anyway, the book begins with a stimulating chapter on axiomatic methods, with historical commentary running throughout. It considers the strengths and weaknesses of various sets of axioms including those of Euclid, Hilbert and Birkhoff. These are considered in the context of consistency, independence and completeness, followed by some explanation of Gödel’s Incompleteness theorem. Chapters 2 to 6 are respectively devoted to Euclidean Geometry, Analytic Geometry, Constructions, Transformation Geometry and Symmetry.
Chapters 7 and 8 provide a cogent introduction to NonEuclidean Geometry and NonEuclidean Transformations and I particularly liked the author’s treatment of all this material. Initial motivation comes from a reexamination of Euclid’s axioms and the history of the parallel postulate. Also, Project 2 (in the very first chapter) requires the use of Geometry Explorer to test the validity of Euclidean properties in hyperbolic geometry, thereby setting the scene for later major investigation of the Poincaré model. The Klein model is also introduced and shown to be structurally equivalent to that of Poincaré. Marvellous stuff!
The last chapter provides an appealing introduction to Fractal Geometry together with discussion of many relevant ideas such as contraction mappings, algorithmic geometry and spacefilling curves. And Geometry Explorer is again brought into action via ‘Projects’ on Snowflake Curves, Complex Branching Systems and IFS Ferns.
Intended for use with mathematics students at ‘junior or senior collegiate level’, the book requires a background in geometry provided by elementary high school and some expertise with matrix algebra and groups is also recommended. Generally, I very much like this book but, for the following reasons, I have considerable reservations regarding its use with such a target group.
Of course, no review is complete without mention of one or two minor quibbles. Firstly, it was not the Arabs who introduced symbols such as x^{2}, and I still shudder on seeing expressions like 1/0 = ∞. Finally, no history of vector analysis is complete without mention of Willard Gibbs!
However, if only for the chapters on axiomatics, nonEuclidean and fractal geometry, this book should be regarded as a very valuable addition to the existing literature. Moreover, it is suitable for use with a much wider readership than specified by the author, but it wouldn’t be my first choice as a selftuition manual for those with weak geometric backgrounds.
Peter Ruane is retired from university teaching and now dabbles in as many creative diversions as possible.
